12-10-2021 – A Word to the Wise – THE GIFTS PART II
This then is the frame of the creation given at conception. Rather than a product of experiences it is the frame for which all experiences occur and develop.
Romans 12: 4-7 sets the stage for the Biblical understanding of the gifts which it specifies as seven; (Prophet, Teacher, Administrator, Encourager, and Server. Giver, Mercy). Interpretation of this passage varies with scholars.
The Motivational Gifts paper describes some of the individual traits of each of the gifts so I will not rehearse them here. These traits are clearly seen much earlier than adulthood.
So the question arises when may they be seen? And more importantly what is their source and purpose? They are given by the Lord to each individual and marks that person as His creation. There are several scriptures which assure this interest by the Creator. Psalm 139, Job 10:8,11; Isa 49:1,5; 44:2; and Lk 1:15,31 to name a few. So how do the gifts appear in the womb?
Look at the Gift of Server. The traits of this Gift are physical in nature. Sensitivity to the physical environment is enhanced, specifically, heat, cold, smell, taste, are traits of this gift. At the same time the Server tends to reject negative emotions.
The purpose for this rejection is to intensify the physical ability of the individual. Suppression of the emotions increases physical ability and stamina. One might expect in the womb to see increased physical activity for longer period of time. Exploration of the environment occurs. What one will not see is direct response to emotions. The mother’s emotional state will tend to be ignored by the fetus.
There are core issues with each of the gifts that make up these filters. For instance, the Teacher from the beginnings filters everything through Truth. The Mercy assesses everything through the filter of pain. The Exhorter filters with consequences. The Giver through material value, the Prophet filters virtue, the Organizer through loyalty, the Serve filters service. These filters strain out what is immaterial, and what is important.
The gifts precede personality development and give direction to the personality while experience presents the opportunity to learn. Even in the womb some of this may be observed.
The passivity of the Mercy may be observed with slowness to respond. In contrast the Prophet presents with hyperactivity, quick response in the environment.
Also the Prophet fetus will more strongly react to feeling on the part of the mother who rejects the child. The Mercy infant will desire to heal the mother, and attempt to calm her anxious spirit. The Server will attempt to distract the mother away from distressing feelings.
Using this perspective some answers may present themselves to some things that occur in the womb.
The Mercy gift is slow to react because the gift filters everything through the emotional state before it gets to the intellect. Every feeling of the mother is experienced intensely by the fetus. This may explain the phenomena of some miscarriage where the mother rejects the pregnancy, thinks about abortion and eventually miscarries. (Cf. Abortion and Fears of Abandonment. R.J. Weil and C. Tupper, Personality, Life Situation, and Communication: A Study of Habitual Abortion, “Psychosomatic Medicine, 22:6, Nov.-Dec. 1960, pp.448-455).
Because this gift is so sensitive to emotions it feels the absolute rejection by the mother and therefore takes its own life.
My purpose here is not to prove what takes place in the womb rather to suggest what may occur. These suggestions are based on intensive studies of the Motivational Gifts, personality, and the womb.
But before we get to far ahead let’s take a step back and look at both some Biblical and extra Biblical womb experiences to see a more intimate view of what happens and how the molding forms future directions.
Now we are going to alter course somewhat. We will examine a few actual events observed in in the womb or events and there aftereffects on the child after birth. It is important here for me to say that what we will be looking at with the gifts cannot be ‘proved.’
In fact there are major groups who would deny development of these traits in the womb. Other groups who would agree but interpret the material in a different manner. This is how I understand the material.
Our ultimate purpose is to understand the gifts prenatal, and post-natal and is crucial when the parents wants to motivate the child in obedience, and general spiritual matters. The womb gives the parent a method of laying a strong foundation which will follow the child thru-out life.
There appears to be at least three major ways a mother and fetus communicate. The first is physically. The second is behaviorally. The third is emotionally.
Physical communication seems to be the most researched and is seen most often in physical traumatic experiences. Evidence that the fetus experiences this type of trauma is evidenced when the newborn is underweight, colicky, cranky, irritable, and tends to cry a lot.
Studies done post World War II in the Netherlands looked at individuals conceived and born during the period October 1944- May 1945. During this period the Germans blockade food deliveries severely in the West, and moderately in the North and South Netherlands.
The result of the studies was a significant because they reveal a steady rise in men who were conceived during the early part of the famine with Antisocial Behavioral patterns. Those affected in the second and third trimester were not as seriously impacted as those conceived in the first trimester.
Numerous studies done since this have shown that the intense fear, and anxiety, caused by natural disasters, and terror for whatever other reason has significant effects on the fetus, as seen in fetus movement, heartbeat, and lack of movement activity in the womb.
Another form of physical communication is found in the medical literature 1978-1979. An obstetrician while attempting an amniocentesis accidentally strikes a fetus on the shoulder. The fetus turned away from the needle locates it with his arm and strikes the needle repeatedly. This behavior was focused attention by the fetus at just 22 weeks. (David Chamberlain, Windows to the Womb, p. 46).
Another pediatric surgeon experienced a fetus holding the needle during an amniocentesis. Thus, you not only have the fetus communicating physically with the mother but others as well.
Dr. Piontelli a researcher with a background in psychotherapy did a project with pregnant mothers using ultrasound and continued following the children for four years.
The results of the ultrasound study and follow-up of the child Pina is quite interesting. During the second ultra-sonographic observation at the twentieth week Dr. Piontelli was able to detect considerable movement by the fetus.
The child has a wide range of movements, kicking, and playing. Observations the second month after birth indicated a very alert child, exploring every detail of the environment. An investigative trait that continued for 4 years after the birth.
The second form of communication is behavioral in nature. The most common form of behavioral communication is kicking. This may run the gamut from minor nudges to severe kicks. Here are some examples.
A prospective father tended to reject the doctor’s suggestion that the fetus and mother would or could communicate. So the doctor had the father press his head against the abdomen of the mother and yell loudly. As he did there was a sudden eruption on the skin of the mother’s abdomen. The fetus had severely kicked the mother because of the intrusion. (Verny, 85).
Another behavioral example is music. Several major studies has shown that the fetus seems to enjoy listening to Mozart. However, music by Beethoven or hard rock music causes incessant kicking on the part of the fetus. The fetus does not like this type of music and communicates it to the mother.
Kicking may all so be signs of something far more severe John Kelly tells of one of his patients who in the 28th week started to experience sharp jabs by the fetus. This kick grew in intensity until the mother became alarmed went to see her obstetrician. He diagnosed a placenta previa, conditions which threatened the life of the child. After treatment the kicking stopped and five weeks later a normal delivery occurred.
Thus, in kicking behavior the fetus communicated a messages to the mother, about a life threatening circumstance.
The third form of communication is emotional in nature. The mother communicates to the child that it is accepted, or rejected, loved, or hated.
Several types of hormones are transmitted to the fetus during pregnancy, and some from the child to the mother which telegraph certain stages of growth. However, there are other messages not related to hormones which may transpire. These are often referred to as sympathetic communications. Now the two, emotional and sympathetic may appear as similar but are not.
Dr. Sontag, differentiates between the emotional and sympathetic communication for us with a couple of examples. One mother experienced the death of her husband in a traffic accident. Because of the introduction of all manner of hormones in the mother the fetus reacted violently with fetal movements ten times the magnitude of the movements prior to the accident.
This infant is reacting to the magnitude of hormones coming from the mother due to the loss and upheaval. Communications are introduced through the flood of anxiety-provoking hormones coursing through the system. These hormones make the fetus worried and fearful. In this case and in similar circumstances where the mother experiences heavy amounts of hormone releases due to external events the child may later be born colicky, irritable and crying a lot.
Mary, and I had personal experience with this very condition. During the first trimester of our second child, we experienced significant upheaval in our personal life which included a car accident, and move. Our daughter had significant problems during the first year post-natal. Conditions included severe colic and irritability.
Numerous studies show that a variety of events affecting the mother effect the child. Some within seconds of the mother’s heart beginning to race the infant’s heart rate doubles as well.
In contrast the sympathetic communication between mother and fetus are far more subtle. In this group are those mothers who do not want to be bothered by pregnancy they communicate to the child. “I do not want you.”
It has been known for some time that the feelings of the mother affect the unborn fetus. Thomas Verny (The Secret Life of the Unborn Child, p.89), introduces the idea that ambivalence on the part of the mother, may be sensed by some fetus and who thus may self-induce abortion.
It is felt by many professionals that an unusual large number of spontaneous abortions which are not founded in any medical condition may be the result of the infant’s detection of these subtle emotions, and therefore the fetus terminates the pregnancy. If not terminating in abortion the result of the ambivalence may appear in other ways by the infant after birth.
A graphic example is provided by a leading European obstetrician. He tells of the birth of a female child, Kristina by name. The labor and deliver was fine and Kristina appeared healthy.
However, there was no attempt by Kristina to move toward the mother’s breast. In fact she refused the breast and would turn her head. When inserted in her mouth she would spit it out. When given formula milk Kristina drank hardily.
Concerned about the reason for the rejection of the breast after several days the doctor devised an experiment. Kristina was offered breast feeding by another new mother. Kristina immediately grasp the breast and began sucking hungrily.
Upon questioning the mother revealed that she did not want Kristina, rather wanted an abortion. But finally gave in for her husband’s sake.
Kristina had known for some time of the mother’s rejections and returned it in kind. In this later circumstance the only way for Kristina to know of her mother’s true feelings was to sense her mother’s emotions. The mother had never verbalized the feelings.
In 1988 studies funded by the World Health Organization were published. The results were eye opening. The study focused on the outcome of babies who were wanted and those unwanted.
The study was conducted over a twenty-five-year period. The results revealed that unwanted babies tended to be premature, had a high mortality rate, had more handicaps, lower IQ’s, troubled relationships, had more long term illnesses, prone to more criminal activity, drank more, prone to drug use, and exhibited poor parenting skills themselves later in life. .
Thus, we have the three major kinds of communication between mother and child; physical, behavioral, emotional.
So, let’s see if we have a biblical example of womb behavior :
Probably the most popular biblical story is that of Jacob and Esau. Rebekah, shortly after conception found herself the host of twins who battled each other in the womb. Consternation led her to inquire of the Lord what was happening. The Lord told her they were twins struggling with each other and they would be the fathers of two great nations.
The battle continued even into labor and delivery, when it was apparent to the mid wife that the younger had grab the heel of the older as if to precede him in birth. This struggle that began in the womb continued throughout their entire life.
Jacob was a Giver, Esau a Server. Neither gift will suffer the presence of emotional conflict, it is to be avoided. The Giver puts the emphasis on material things and their value. They give high quality gifts. They tend not to learn from their mistakes. We see these traits in abundance with Jacob.
Esau the Server puts little emphasis on the material thus we having him give his birthright for next to nothing. He is angry with his brother but does not seek his presence.
Esau cannot abide emotional conflict. Jacob being a Giver attempts to finally heal the breech with his brother with a multitude of expensive gifts for that is how Giver think one resolve problems.
Esau the Server does not want the gifts for to a Server you heal the problem with acceptance and praise. So from the womb till the final meeting we see these twins acting out the various traits of their gifts.
Unusual? Maybe but Piontelli in her book “From Fetus to Child” (pg. 147-162) describes in graphic detail the battle between twins. In this case it was the eighteenth week of pregnancy and an hour-long observation with ultrasound.
She and other doctors watched in astonishment as the twins hit and punched each other in the womb. This struggle between the two lasted throughout the pregnancy eventually into labor and because of threat to their life they were delivered by Caesarean. The twins were followed closely for the next four years and yes they continued to battle each other just like Jacob and Esau.
So what does all of this have to do with the Gifts?
To be continued:
Read Full Post »